Your AI legal agent
Research, draft, review, and analyze, all from one conversational interface. Pick a named agent for the job, or turn on Plan mode and approve a checklist before it works through every task on its own.
Everything you need,
one interface.
Legal research plans the search, reads 16M+ SC and HC judgments, and cites the exact paragraph.
Draft and review drafts in your firm's voice, then redlines with tracked changes you accept or reject.
- 12 Jan 2025FIR registered · PS Saket
- 14 Jan 2025Arrest and first remand
- 15 Mar 2025Day 60: no chargesheet on record
- 18 Mar 2025Extension granted without reasons
Case analysis reads petitions and orders, builds the timeline, and flags the ground nobody raised.
Live web search checks today's gazette, bills and judgments, so every answer reflects current law.
Persistent memory remembers your matters, style and preferences, and applies them without being told.
SELECT matter, court, next_hearing FROM hearings WHERE next_hearing < now() + '7 days';
MCP connects to your case-management database, drive and calendar over MCP, and answers from live records.
Common questions
Anything that involves reading, writing or checking legal documents. Research a point of law across Supreme Court and High Court judgments, draft an agreement or notice in your firm's voice, redline a counterparty draft with tracked changes, build a chronology from a bundle of pleadings, or check whether an argument has been run before. Describe the outcome you want rather than the steps, and the agent works out the steps.
A quick question gets a direct answer. Anything with several moving parts gets a plan first: the agent proposes a numbered checklist, waits for your approval, and only then starts work. You can edit the steps, reorder them or drop any you do not want before it runs. Nothing happens behind your back.
Yes. Every step is on screen while it happens — which document it opened, which search it ran, which sub-agent it handed a question to. Each claim in the answer carries a citation that links to the exact page or paragraph it came from, and you can open the source beside the answer to check it yourself.
It says so. The system looks for the quoted words in the source before showing you a citation. When it cannot find them, the citation is marked unverified rather than presented as confirmed. An agent that admits a gap is more useful than one that fills it confidently.
Both. Upload Word, PDF and spreadsheet files and the agent reads them alongside the case law. It drafts and redlines directly on your documents, and the changes export back to Word as real tracked changes you accept or reject in the usual way.
Yes. Alongside the judgment corpus the agent checks live sources — today's gazette, recent bills and newly reported decisions — so an answer reflects the law as it stands rather than as of a training cutoff.
Yes, over MCP. Connect your case-management database, document drive or calendar and the agent answers from live records instead of asking you to paste them in. Teams can also add custom skills for workflows they repeat.