Use cases

Built for how Indian law is practised

Litigation, corporate, in-house, compliance or a practice of one — the same agents, pointed at the work in front of you. Pick the one closest to your day.

Disputes & Litigation

Walk into the hearing knowing the record cold

Petitions, replies, orders and annexures land as one pile. The agent reads all of it, builds the chronology, and tells you which authority actually governs the point you are arguing.

  • Chronology and issue list built from the petition and its annexures
  • Research on the point in issue, cited to the paragraph
  • Grounds you have not pleaded yet, flagged against the record
  • Draft replies, rejoinders and written submissions in your house style
AgentsCase lawProjects
Disputes & Litigation
Corporate & Transactions

Diligence and drafting across the whole deal

Ask your diligence questions once and the agents answer them for every document in the data room. Then draft and redline the paper that follows, to your firm's positions.

  • Change of control, assignment and termination clauses pulled across hundreds of agreements
  • Red flags ranked, with the exact clause and page behind each one
  • A diligence grid you can export to Excel for the report
  • First drafts and redlines of NDAs, MSAs and vendor paper in your format
Tabular reviewDraftingMulti agents
Corporate & Transactions
Regulatory & Competition

Know the day the law changes, not the quarter

Live gazette and web search, read against the obligations you actually carry, so a notification becomes a task list instead of a surprise.

  • Amendments, notifications and circulars tracked as they are published
  • Obligation registers mapped to the statute and rule behind each item
  • CCI and sector regulator decisions researched with verified citations
  • Filing calendars and internal checklists kept current
Live web searchCase lawAgents
Regulatory & Competition
In-House Legal Teams

Absorb the volume without adding headcount

Business teams ask; legal answers. The agent handles the routine intake so counsel spend their time on the questions that genuinely need judgment.

  • Standard NDAs and vendor paper reviewed against your playbook
  • Precedent and prior positions surfaced from your own past matters
  • Policies, notices and board material drafted in your in-house voice
  • A shared workspace per matter, with role-based access for the business
ProjectsMemoryTabular review
In-House Legal Teams
FAQ

Common questions

My practice does not fit neatly into one of these. Does it still work?

Yes. These four are the most common shapes, not the boundaries. The agents work on documents, case law and drafting, which is most of legal practice — IP, employment, tax, real estate and family practitioners use the same tools pointed at their own matters.

Do I need to set anything up for my practice area?

No. The agent takes its cue from the matter in front of it and from what it has learned about how you work. Firms with a settled house method often add workflows for the tasks they repeat, but nothing is required before you get useful work out of it.

Is this useful for a practice of one?

It is arguably most useful there. A solo practitioner gets the research capacity and drafting turnaround that would otherwise need a junior, and the agent learns their voice rather than imposing a firm's.

How is litigation work different from transactional work here?

Mostly in what the agent reads. Litigation leans on the judgment corpus, chronologies from the record, and checking whether an argument has run before. Transactional work leans on your own documents — reviewing a stack of contracts at once, redlining counterparty paper, and drafting to your standard positions.

Can an in-house team use it without involving external counsel?

Yes, and that is a common pattern: triage the volume in-house, take the genuinely hard questions to counsel. Shared workspaces and role controls mean the team can work on the same matters without everyone seeing everything.

How do we know it is right about our area of law?

You check it, in one click. Every proposition carries a citation that links to the exact paragraph it came from, and where the system cannot verify quoted words in a source, it marks the citation unverified rather than presenting it as confirmed.

What is the quickest way to see whether it fits our work?

Take a matter you have already finished and run it again. You know the answer, so you can judge the quality directly. Sign up free, or book a 30-minute call and we will walk through a live workflow in your practice area.

Crafted for both lawyer and firms. Start using today.

Get started